<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>open weights on ZGM.org</title>
    <link>https://zgm.org/tags/open-weights/</link>
    <description>Recent content in open weights on ZGM.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://zgm.org/tags/open-weights/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A Ban on Chinese Open Models Would Fail, and Kimi K3 Just Proved It</title>
      <link>https://zgm.org/a-ban-on-chinese-open-models-would-fail-and-kimi-k3-just-proved-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://zgm.org/a-ban-on-chinese-open-models-would-fail-and-kimi-k3-just-proved-it/</guid>
      <description>I&amp;rsquo;m a hawk on this. I think the export controls on advanced chips are correct, I think Beijing&amp;rsquo;s technology apparatus serves an authoritarian state that will use every capability it acquires against people who can&amp;rsquo;t vote it out, and I&amp;rsquo;ve never found the argument that engagement moderates that state persuasive on any evidence I&amp;rsquo;ve seen. If you&amp;rsquo;re looking for someone to tell you the controls were a mistake, keep looking.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
